tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31189917.post4373091901985116806..comments2024-03-11T04:40:23.756-07:00Comments on The Blog of Phyz: Science PhD gender gap narrowing?Dean Bairdhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17681829220589441713noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31189917.post-13313438033930496642007-05-16T19:29:00.000-07:002007-05-16T19:29:00.000-07:00I was willing to grant them that one. I figured it...I was willing to grant them that one. I figured it was some inherent necessity of their data. Perhaps I was too generous.<BR/><BR/>I was bothered by the non-zero zero value at the base of the graph. It starts at 10%. I know they do that to "magnify," but it's still a graphing foul.Dean Bairdhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17681829220589441713noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-31189917.post-60238721609977582622007-05-16T19:10:00.000-07:002007-05-16T19:10:00.000-07:00Stevie Ray says:Hmm...let me see.The first value s...Stevie Ray says:<BR/>Hmm...let me see.<BR/><BR/>The first value shown on the x-axis is labeled 1994-1996 (I assume 1995 is in there somewhere); the second value shown is 1995-1997. It seems to me that the person constructing the graph has a time-warp problem?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com